No I don’t think that contradicts both being the prize because being the ”head of the household” is subjective. What makes a person the head? One person may take the lead in some areas and the other mate takes it in other areas. I think being the prize has more to do with the value placed on the person and what they offer their mate than it does the title of their ”role”. Some wealthy people may feel like their nanny is a bigger prize than their husband or wife.
I agree with you. Most melinated women equate material things to love and success. BUT overlook the men who has less instead of focusing on what matters ,which is How HE TREATS YOU. AND HOW YOU TREAT HIM. Both of them in alignment money wouldn’t be and issue.. we both the prize.
3 years ago
@Lasean Hill : 🤣🤣🤣🤣😂🤣😂
3 years ago
@Lasean Hill : Excellent point I just wish everyone seen it that way.
3 years ago
No I don’t think that contradicts both being the prize because being the ”head of the household” is subjective. What makes a person the head? One person may take the lead in some areas and the other mate takes it in other areas. I think being the prize has more to do with the value placed on the person and what they offer their mate than it does the title of their ”role”. Some wealthy people may feel like their nanny is a bigger prize than their husband or wife.
3 years ago
And yes nobody wants to be involved with a bunch of kids.. Shat I don’t either
3 years ago
I agree with you. Most melinated women equate material things to love and success. BUT overlook the men who has less instead of focusing on what matters ,which is How HE TREATS YOU. AND HOW YOU TREAT HIM. Both of them in alignment money wouldn’t be and issue.. we both the prize.
3 years ago
Glad to hear you agree. The man being the head of household you don’t think that contradicts both being the prize?
3 years ago
I disagree too. I think both partners should be the prize. If they don’t value each other, how can the relationship thrive?